MARKET REPORT
Market conditions are ever-changing.
Today’s news is tomorrow’s history.
It has been said that with hindsight, we are all geniuses!
Please visit here frequently as this section will contain periodic updates.
9-Mos. Market Report
2010—2009—2008—2007
Data (closed sales, January 1st through September 30th for each of the 4-yrs.) are for all single-family attached (i.e., townhomes, individual condo units) and detached (“houses”) single-family properties. Data are from “connectMLS” and are assumed to be correct.
Caution: Movement in Average or Median housing prices from one period to another cannot be understood as indicating price movement applicable to a particular property or even to a particular neighborhood. Housing is diverse and many factors (including numbers of REOs/Short Sales) affect the prices.
In the data presentation below, you will observe the following:
1st, There was an increase in number of sales, first 9-mos. 2010 vs. same period in 2009. This positive trend is due, at least in part, to a recovery from the “shock-wave” that followed the demise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 9-2008.
2nd, For the six counties and City of Chicago (fyi: Chicago data are also incorporated in with Cook County data), only Lake County had increases in both the Median Sold Price and Average Sold Price (first 9-mos. of 2010 vs. the first 9-mos. of 2009). For the other areas, the Median & Average Sold Price declined (except: Chicago experiencing a modest increase in the Average Sold Price).
3rd, All 2010 prices are significantly less than 2008 and 2007 prices.
4th, Percentage change in the median sold price, 2010 period vs. 2009 period:
Cook County (including Chicago): -7.65%; DuPage County: -2.5%; Kane County: -11.9%; Lake County: +5.5%; McHenry County: -8.1%; Will County: -4.1%; City of Chicago: -8.9%.
Again, movement in the median (or, average) sold price is not to be understood as being applicable to price movement for a particular property (or, to a particular neighborhood).
5th, My observation and opinion: There have been increasing sales activity and many markets are working to absorb REOs and Short Sales; this is a positive. On the flip-side of the coin, there are many neighborhoods that are inundated (and some not so) with REOs and Short Sales. As a broad generalization, many markets remain much more of a “buyer’s market” than not.
6th, Access prior market data reports (click-on “market report”) at our website: www.AppraisalQualityAssurance.com
| COOK COUNTY (Includes Chicago) |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
32,211 |
187,000 |
260,994 |
157 days |
| 2009 |
28,818 |
202,500 |
262,146 |
169 |
| 2008 |
32,102 |
262,000 |
340,602 |
148 |
| 2007 |
44,005 |
268,000 |
338,996 |
121 |
DUPAGE COUNTY |
| 2010 |
6107 |
230,000 |
299,539 |
171 days |
| 2009 |
5657 |
236,000 |
302,348 |
182 |
| 2008 |
6391 |
269,000 |
339,910 |
157 |
| 2007 |
8708 |
273,000 |
346,000 |
121 |
KANE COUNTY |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
3669 |
170,000 |
200,044 |
166 days |
| 2009 |
2787 |
193,000 |
221,181 |
193 |
| 2008 |
3268 |
218,250 |
259,435 |
162 |
| 2007 |
4628 |
231,000 |
274,947 |
124 |
LAKE COUNTY |
| 2010 |
1800 |
192,000 |
281,716 |
186 days |
| 2009 |
1309 |
182,000 |
270,367 |
186 |
| 2008 |
1701 |
237,100 |
344,895 |
179 |
| 2007 |
2488 |
249,500 |
357,304 |
140 |
McHENRY COUNTY |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
2125 |
170,000 |
195,321 |
177 days |
| 2009 |
1955 |
185,000 |
204,627 |
192 |
| 2008 |
2242 |
203,125 |
238,003 |
170 |
| 2007 |
3057 |
230,000 |
260,859 |
135 |
WILL COUNTY |
| 2010 |
4480 |
175,000 |
208,905 |
154 days |
| 2009 |
4391 |
182,500 |
213,586 |
169 |
| 2008 |
4806 |
215,000 |
251,125 |
159 |
| 2007 |
6572 |
225,000 |
263,476 |
120 |
CITY OF CHICAGO |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
15,088 |
205,000 |
280,810 |
149 days |
| 2009 |
14,338 |
225,,000 |
280,425 |
160 |
| 2008 |
17,482 |
295,135 |
371,126 |
138 |
| 2007 |
23,221 |
290,000 |
354,821 |
122 |
Lee Lansford, IFA, ASA, has been appraising since 1983 and has been licensed (Certified Residential) in Illinois since the inception of appraiser licensing in the early 1990s.
He is a member of the Illinois “Real Estate Appraisal Administration & Disciplinary Board” (appointed by the Governor in 8-2008). Among Illinois licensed Certified Appraisers, he is 1 of 28 (out of approximately 4200 Certified Appraisers) who is a “Appraiser Qualifications Board” (AQB) Certified Instructor of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (such governs appraisal practice). Further, he is past-instructor of “appraisal principles” at the College of DuPage (Glen Ellyn, IL).
Lee has served in various leadership positions (past-Director, IL Coalition of Appraisal Professionals—or, ICAP; current State Director & National Director of the National Assoc. of Independent Fee Appraisers—NAIFA, past President of the Chicago Chapter of NAIFA) within the appraisal profession. He is a professionally designated member (Residential) of both the NAIFA and the American Society of Appraisers (ASA).
4-Mos. Market Report
2010—2009—2008—2007
Data are from the “connectMLS” and are assumed correct. Data (closed sales, January 1st through April 30th for each of the 4-yrs.) are for all single-family attached (i.e., townhomes, individual condo units) and detached (“houses”) single-family properties.
Caution: Movement in Average or Median housing prices from one period to another cannot be understood as indicating price movement applicable to a particular property. This is due to “what” (there’s a great variation in housing) may be selling during a particular period; further, the presence of properties that are REOs (bank-owned) & Short Sales (current lender accepts less than full pay-off of existing loan balance)—such properties seldom having sold prices at the “high-end” of neighborhood housing prices.
In what follows, you will observe the following:
1st, There was an increase in number of sales, first 4-mos. 2010 vs. same period in 2009. The increase is due, I surmise, to a recovery from the “shock-wave” that followed the demise of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 9-2008.
2nd, Among the six counties and City of Chicago (fyi: Chicago data are also incorporated in with Cook County data), only Lake County had an upward movement in both the Median Sold Price and Average Sold Price when comparing the first 4-mos. of 2010 vs. the first 4-mos. of 2009. Thus, 6 of the 7 areas surveyed experienced a downward movement in these two prices.
| COOK COUNTY (Includes Chicago) |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
12,721 |
180,000 |
249,844 |
163 days |
| 2009 |
8857 |
189,000 |
253,861 |
177 |
| 2008 |
11,957 |
259,000 |
342,954 |
147 |
| 2007 |
16,906 |
257,500 |
326,523 |
128 |
DUPAGE COUNTY |
| 2010 |
2315 |
222,000 |
291,855 |
185 days |
| 2009 |
1599 |
230,000 |
300,136 |
188 |
| 2008 |
2214 |
261,000 |
339,563 |
168 |
| 2007 |
3175 |
270,000 |
338,011 |
132 |
KANE COUNTY |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
1376 |
160,000 |
186,267 |
168 days |
| 2009 |
855 |
175,000 |
206,554 |
203 |
| 2008 |
1135 |
215,500 |
251,120 |
164 |
| 2007 |
1822 |
221,583 |
263,325 |
129 |
LAKE COUNTY |
| 2010 |
1800 |
192,000 |
281,716 |
186 days |
| 2009 |
1309 |
182,000 |
270,367 |
186 |
| 2008 |
1701 |
237,100 |
344,895 |
179 |
| 2007 |
2488 |
249,500 |
357,304 |
140 |
McHENRY COUNTY |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
859 |
160,000 |
190,825 |
179 days |
| 2009 |
653 |
175,000 |
195,785 |
194 |
| 2008 |
825 |
205,000 |
235,230 |
172 |
| 2007 |
1064 |
220,000 |
254,733 |
140 |
WILL COUNTY |
| 2010 |
1701 |
165,900 |
194,058 |
154 days |
| 2009 |
1409 |
180,000 |
209,618 |
169 |
| 2008 |
1735 |
214,000 |
248,573 |
159 |
| 2007 |
2542 |
220,000 |
250,728 |
120 |
CITY OF CHICAGO |
| Year |
# Sold |
$Median Price |
$Average Price |
Average Days-on-Market |
| 2010 |
6378 |
200,000 |
274,870 |
154 days |
| 2009 |
4533 |
210,000 |
276,566 |
169 |
| 2008 |
6775 |
294,835 |
381,524 |
136 |
| 2007 |
8807 |
279,900 |
343,420 |
130 |
This market report contains historical sold data (source: “connectMLS”) for all single-family detached (“houses”) and detached (townhouses, condo units) in the various counties in and around Chicago.
Please note that movement in Median and/or Average Sold Prices cannot be applied to a specific property in order to approximate the price movement from one period to another! The average and median prices are affected by WHAT is selling and, also, by numbers of bank-owned (REO) and Short Sale transactions.
As general observations, sales volume (numbers of sales) remained fairly constant between 2009 and 2008…but far less than the volume for 2007. Further, median and average sold prices continued their decline during 2009 versus the prior years.
Cook County
Year # Sold $Median Price $Average Price
2009 40,490 199,000 257,842
2008 40,050 253,000 330,326
2007 54,266 266,000 340,242
DuPage County
2009 7941 231,000 295,530
2008 7921 264,500 335,731
2007 10,575 272,000 347,035
Kane County
Year # Sold $Median Price $Average Price
2009 4027 187,450 217,263
2008 4078 215,000 253,360
2007 5672 230,000 274,303
Lake County
2009 6004 196,500 280,509
2008 6016 240,000 341,311
2007 8178 260,000 380,887
McHenry County
2009 2773 181,000 201,621
2008 2786 200,000 237,427
2007 3817 226,500 258,004
Will County
2009 6137 180,000 210,315
2008 5964 210,700 246,576
2007 8070 224,900 262,451
If you would like to have similar data for a more refined area, or, community, please contact Lee Lansford, IFA.
Market Report
2008 vs. 2007
Chicago & Suburban Areas
INTRODUCTION
This is a report of certain (Sold Properties: average days-on-market for sold properties; median sold price; average sold price. For Sale: supply & average days-on-market, aka: DOM) market data for the counties located in northeastern Illinois:
Cook (includes the City of Chicago), DuPage, Kane, Kendall, Lake, McHenry and Will.
The data which are reported are specific to all single-family—both detached (“houses”) and attached (individual condo units, townhouses etc.)—dwellings.
The tables below present certain data (per the “compassMLS”; effective as of 1-1-09) for each county. Data is by county with 2008 data presented first and followed by 2007 data. Data for the “Sold Properties” are contained in these tables. Data specific to “For Sale” (effective as of 1-1-2009) are contained within the “Summary” section (below) of this report and are not contained in any of the tables.
Please be aware that this broad overview of market activity should not—and, cannot—be used, or interpreted to apply, to any one specific property or neighborhood or community in any of these counties. As an example, a decline in either the median or average sold price from one period to another includes (during 2008) increasing numbers of REO and/or Short Sale transactions. Market conditions affect sales activity and prices and the results will vary widely from location to location and sub-markets within a larger market.
As a generalization, market conditions are best characterized as a “buyers’ market”.
Clients may request a “market report” tailored to a specific need and location by contacting me via e-mail at Lee@AppraisalQA.com
SUMMARY
Sold Properties
Sales Activity (“# Units” in the tables below): Sales activity throughout the 7 counties during 2008 saw a notable decline in comparison to 2007.
What follows is the percentage decline in sales volume (# sold) for each county between these two years: Cook, -26.7%..........DuPage, -25.4%..........Kane, -28.4%..........Kendall, -25.5%..........Lake, -26.8% …......McHenry, -27.1%.........Will, -26.3%.
Average Marketing Time (“Avg. MT” in the tables below) for each of the counties in 2008 was between 5 and 6 months. During 2007, you will observe that the average was approximately 4 (or, for certain counties, slightly in excess of 4 full months) months. Lengthening marketing time is an indicator of slowing market activity.
Median Sold Price: For each county, the 2008 median sold price is less than the 2007 median sold price.
The percentage decline for each county for these two years:
Cook, -4.9%; DuPage, -2.6%; Kane, -6.5%; Kendall, -1.1%; Lake, -7.7%; McHenry, -11.7%; Will, -6.2%.
Average Sold Price: For each county, the 2008 average sold price is less than the 2007 average sold price. The percentage decline for each county for these two years:
Cook, -2.7%; DuPage, -3.2%; Kane, -6.5%; Kendall, -4.1%; Lake, -10.3%; McHenry, -8%; Will, -6%.
For Sale Properties
Assuming (and, this is no small assumption)—for the purpose of analysis—that the number of sales during 2008 represents the sales volume for 2009, and comparing these numbers to the number currently (as of 1-1-2009) “For Sale”, indicates markets in over-supply with each (exception: Will) county having a supply of housing that may take more than one full year to absorb.
In very general thinking, a supply that is projected (or, estimated) to be absorbed in, say, approximately a 6-month period might indicate a market that is characterized as being “in-balance”. Note that this is a generalization and not an absolute. Still, the differences are significant.
Further, for the combined 7 counties, current average days-on-market (DOM) is approximately 8 months. Within these counties, such a relatively large average DOM would not be expected to be present in markets characterized as being either “in balance” or having “under-supply” status.
For each county, supply (for sale) status as of 1-1-2009:
Cook: 41,445 for sale vs. 39,768 sold in 2008; average days-on-market = 233 days.
DuPage: 8066 for sale vs. 7890 sold in 2008; average DOM = 247 days.
Kane: 4699 for sale vs. 4059 sold in 2008; average DOM = 237 days.
Kendall: 1551 for sale vs. 1305 sold in 2008; average DOM = 245 days.
Lake: 7111 for sale vs. 5987 sold in 2008; average DOM = 250 days.
McHenry: 3397 for sale vs. 2781 sold in 2008; average DOM = 254 days.
Will: 5869 for sale vs. 5945 sold in 2008; average DOM = 221 days.
DATA PRESENTATION
Sold Properties: 2007 & 2008
(per compassMLS)
Home | Contact Us | What we Do | Forensic Appraisal | Appraisal Review | Clients Served | Attorneys | Qualified Instructor | Consumers | Appraisal Quality Assurance | Expert Witness | About | Links | Market Reports | Blog |